Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Chambers v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 2:2018cv00613
Plaintiff:
Lambert G. Chambers
Defendant:
R. McFadden-Jensen, B. Stacy, C. Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puckett v. Chrysler et al
as 2:2017cv00513
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Defendant:
J. Chrysler, J. Harbour, B. Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yunuen N. Campos v. Bertram Fuller et al
as 2:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Yunuen N. Campos
Defendant:
Bertram Fuller, Andrew B. Holmes and Holmes Taylor and Jones LLP
Ailes et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2012cv01822
Plaintiff:
Gwendolan E. Ailes , Timothy A. Bolyard , James E. Dailey and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barros v. Minnick, et al
as 2:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Barros
Defendant:
M. Minnick, L. Jackson, Fairamitani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2009cv00784
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Nola Grannis, J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lamon v. Director of the CDC et al
as 2:2008cv01762
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
Director of the CDC, G Stratton, S. Kerman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valley v. Tilton, et al
as 2:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Valley
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, A. J. Malfi, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Zuber et al
as 2:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
Glenn A Dunn
Defendant:
J Zuber, Scott Kernan, B Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Woodford et al
as 2:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Granvil K. Bell, III
Defendant:
Jeanne Woodford, Scott Kernan, J Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
