Cases 41 - 50 of 334
Michael McLaughlin v. Brian Williams, et al
as 20-15406
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Lewis Stewart v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 20-15586
Defendant:
CHERYL BURSON, STATE OF NEVADA, S.L. CLARK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, ROMEO ARANAS, JAMES COX and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEWIS STEWART
Banks v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2020cv00556
Plaintiff:
James Vincent Banks
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc., Doctor Alley, Sgt Risppo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Boyd et al
as 2:2020cv00462
Defendant:
Timothy Filson, William Gittere, Uknown Employees, Agents, or Contractors of the Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Petty v. Brian Williams
as 20-70825
Petitioner:
ANTHONY EDWARD PETTY
Respondent:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Warden
Zacarias-Lopez v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv00175
Respondent:
Brian E. Williams
Petitioner:
Elder Zacarias-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taniko Smith v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 19-17514
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
TANIKO C. SMITH
Dale v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00031
Respondent:
Brian E. Williams and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Eric L. Dale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dennis Grigsby v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 19-17248
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS MARC GRIGSBY
Brian O'Keefe v. Brian Williams, et al
as 19-17152
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN KERRY O'KEEFE
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
