Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Mark Templeton v. Rick Coursey, et al
as 17-35637
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK TEMPLETON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK COURSEY and BRIGITTE AMSBERRY
Niehouse v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv01049
Respondent:
Ms. Brigitte Amsberry
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Branch William Niehouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shields v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00965
Respondent:
Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner:
Paul Kay Shields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Peters et al
as 6:2017cv00889
Defendant:
Brigitte Amsberry, Michael F. Gower, Greg Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Amsberry
as 6:2017cv00525
Respondent:
Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner:
Donald A Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newsome v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00446
Respondent:
Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00133
Defendant:
Ms. Brigitte Amsberry
Plaintiff:
Jacob Nate Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Amsberry
as 2:2016cv02314
Respondent:
Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weaver v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2016cv02226
Respondent:
Brigitte Amsberry and Two Rivers Correctional Inst.
Petitioner:
Richard F. Weaver, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes-Mauro v. Amsberry
as 2:2014cv00802
Respondent:
Brigitte Amsberry
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Noel Reyes-Mauro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
