Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Moretto v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Stephen Moretto
Defendant:
Julie Jones, P. Murphy, Synthia Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathews v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Carlton Xavier Mathews
Defendant:
B. G. Johnson, D. J. Tomalis, M. N. Sowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv01844
Petitioner:
Jonathan C. Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richo v. Williams et al
as 3:2015cv00474
Plaintiff:
Ryan Richo
Defendant:
Candia V. Williams, Eddie D Freeman, Brittany C Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. US Bank Association et al
as 3:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Candia Vanessa Williams
Defendant:
US Bank Association , Douglas C. Zahm, P.A., Tara McDonald, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Williams v. U.S. Bank Association et al
as 3:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
Candia V. Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Association, Douglas C. Zahm , Tara McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Bondi
as 2:2014cv00037
Petitioner:
Clifton C. Williams
Respondent:
Pamela Jo Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00064
Petitioner:
Lonnie C. Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RECTOR v. SMITH AND BOLDEN ASSOCIATES et al
as 4:2013cv00669
Plaintiff:
JAMES RECTOR
Defendant:
SMITH AND BOLDEN ASSOCIATES and DAVID C WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
