Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Moon v. Holinka et al
as 3:2009cv00526
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
Carol Holinka, Marion Feather, Mark Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moon v. Holinka et al
as 3:2009cv00524
Petitioner:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Respondent:
Carol Holinka, Marion Feather, Mark Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moon v. Holinka et al
as 3:2009cv00525
Petitioner:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Respondent:
Carol Holinka, Marion Feather, B. Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pence v. Holinka
as 3:2009cv00489
Petitioner:
Donald Pence
Respondent:
Carol Holinka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walls v. Holinka et al
as 3:2009cv00430
Petitioner:
Felix Walls
Respondent:
Carol Holinka and Article II Sworn Official(s) of the Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moon v. Holinka et al
as 3:2009cv00381
Petitioner:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Respondent:
Carol Holinka, MARION FEATHERS, Mark Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v. Holinka
as 3:2009cv00360
Petitioner:
Jamar Bailey
Respondent:
Carol Holinka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Holinka
as 3:2009cv00307
Petitioner:
Jimmy Quintin Green
Respondent:
Carol Holinka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, George Jones, Carol Holinka and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero-German v. Holinka
as 3:2009cv00044
Petitioner:
Manuel Romero-German
Respondent:
Carol Holinka
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
