Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Velez-Nelson v. USA
as 3:2016cv02846
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christian Velez-Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Soto-Cosme v. USA
as 3:2016cv02023
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christian Soto-Cosme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Morales-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2016cv01704
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Vicente Morales-Rodriguez, Severina Martinez-Martinez, Conjugal Partnership Morales-Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Gronau-Schettini et al
as 3:2016cv01546
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Henry Christian Gronau-Schettini, Jane Doe, Conjugal Parntership Gronau-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Badillo-Hernandez v. USA
as 3:2016cv01060
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christian Badillo-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ortiz v. El Conquistador Partnership, LP, SE
as 3:2016cv01004
Plaintiff:
Christian A. Ortiz
Defendant:
El Conquistador Partnership, LP, SE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valles-Collazo v. USA
as 3:2015cv03110
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christian Valles-Collazo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Flores-Castro v. Ocasio et al
as 3:2015cv02269
Plaintiff:
Christian Flores-Castro
Defendant:
FNU Ocasio and FNU Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera-Arroyo et al v. Hospital General Menonita, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02079
Plaintiff:
Wanda L. Rivera-Arroyo and Hector Diaz-Fournier
Defendant:
Hospital General Menonita, Inc., Sistema de Salud Menonita, Christian E. Hernandez-Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Garcia-Catalan et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02003
Plaintiff:
Christian Garcia-Catalan
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
