Cases 41 - 50 of 272
Rawls v. Miami Dade County et al
as 1:2023cv20085
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rawls
Defendant:
Miami Dade County, Miami Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation, Anthony Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TRIPP et al v. FORD
as 5:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA TRIPP, THOMAS MCFATTER, MICHAEL MURRERO-DELGADO and others
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEFFEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23385
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CONRAD STEFFEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CONRAD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22993
Plaintiff:
SHANE CONRAD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CONRAD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22469
Plaintiff:
KYLE CONRAD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TRIPP et al v. FORD
as 5:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA TRIPP, THOMAS MCFATTER, MICHAEL MURRERO-DELGADO and others
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BORCHERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20558
Plaintiff:
LUKE CONRAD BORCHERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. C.C. Borden Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
C.C. Borden Construction, Inc., Duval Glass & Mirror, Inc., Melissa Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
SCARBROUGH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17779
Plaintiff:
CONRAD SCARBROUGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CONRAD et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv17163
Plaintiff:
Brian M Conrad and NICOLE CONRAD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
