Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Robert E. Stocker v. Consolidated Rail Corp., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-03618
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Stocker
Defendant:
Consolidated Rail Corp
CONNELL v. GARLOCK,INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67834
Plaintiff:
IONA CONNELL
Defendant:
GARLOCK,INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., H.K.PORTER CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
STRUTHERS v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv64102
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND J. STRUTHERS
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP. and PENN CENTRAL CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LYTVYNYUK et al v. COUNTY OF ATLANTIC et al
as 1:2007cv01910
Plaintiff:
SERHIY LYTVYNYUK and SNEZANA LYTVNYNYUK
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
WEIKERT, JR. v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv63751
Plaintiff:
DORSEY D. WEIKERT, JR.
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP., AMERICAN PREMIERE UNDERWRITERS and READING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BALLAS v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00047
Plaintiff:
PENELOPE BALLAS
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Roger John Bauer v. Consolidated Rail Corp., et al.
as NYE/1:05-CV-02181
Defendant:
Consolidated Rail Corp
Plaintiff:
Roger John Bauer
Wayne J. Corcoran v. Consolidated Rail Corp., et al.
as NYE/1:05-CV-02180
Plaintiff:
Wayne J. Corcoran
Defendant:
Consolidated Rail Corp
Frank M. Anselmo v. Consolidated Rail Corp., et al.
as NYE/1:05-CV-00873
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Anselmo
Defendant:
Consolidated Rail Corp
Edward A. Zalinski v. Consolidated Rail Corp., et al.
as NYE/1:05-CV-01491
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Zalinski
Defendant:
Consolidated Rail Corp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
