Cases 41 - 50 of 1,030
In re UiPath, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Michael Bernstein, Maren K. Bowling and Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
Newman v. Wilmington Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Shantell D. Newman
Defendant:
Wilmington Police Department and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. P&F Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01367
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
P&F Industries, Inc., Kenneth M. Scheriff, Mitchell A. Solomon and others
Niquette v. Harris et al
as 1:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Niquette
Defendant:
Taylor C. Harris, Janet D. Widmann, Juliane T. Park and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cutera, Inc.
Philips v. P&F Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
P&F Industries, Inc., Kenneth M. Scheriff, Mitchell A. Solomon and others
Abu Ghazaleh v. Schadt et al
as 1:2023cv01357
Nominal Defendant:
GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Sema
Plaintiff:
Patricia E. Abu Ghazaleh
Defendant:
Eric Schadt, Katherine Stueland, Isaac Ro and others
Ulerio v. Russell et al
as 1:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Juan Ulerio
Defendant:
Austin Russell, Mike McAuliffe, Alec E. Gores and others
Nominal Defendant:
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
Hutchinson v. Russell et al
as 1:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
David Hutchinson
Defendant:
Austin Russell, Mike McAuliffe, Alec E. Gores and others
Nominal Defendant:
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
Dechant et al v. Gores et al
as 1:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Lance Dechant and William Voges
Defendant:
Alec E. Gores, Jun Hong Heng, Mary Lou Jepsen and others
Nominal Defendant:
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
