Cases filed in California
Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Velasquez v. Clay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00750
Plaintiff: Tray Daniel Velasquez
Defendant: Ivan D Clay, Maddox, Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01066
Petitioner: Edgar Bruno Jones
Respondent: Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joseph Stancle v. Ivan D. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01451
Petitioner: Joseph Stancle
Respondent: Ivan D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Brewster v. I D Clay
as 5:2009cv00388
Petitioner: Mark Brewster
Respondent: I D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewster v. Clay
as 3:2009cv00262
Petitioner: Mark Brewster
Respondent: I D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirvin v. Clay
as 2:2009cv00303
Petitioner: Darius Eugene Kirvin
Respondent: Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kirvin v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00265
Petitioner: Darius Eugene Kirvin
Respondent: Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Peter Ralbovsky v. I D Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2008cv01376
Petitioner: Timothy Peter Ralbovsky, .
Respondent: I D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knapp v. Cate, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01779
Plaintiff: Eric Charles Rodney Knapp
Defendant: Matthew Cate, - Calhoun, Ivan D. Clay and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Frank v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv04835
Petitioner: Raymond Timothy Frank
Respondent: Ivan D. Clay
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?