Cases 41 - 50 of 264
Charles v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Charles
Defendant:
Service List, Deanne M Brookhart, Kevin T. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Charles
Defendant:
Deanne M Brookhart, Kevin T Johnson, Darren N Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potmesil v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00281
Plaintiff:
Darren Potmesil
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fleming v. Jefferies et al
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Josh Fleming
Defendant:
Rob Jefferies, Darren Galloway and Warden Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huetteman v. Ford et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Larry Huetteman
Defendant:
Robert B. Ford, Robert E. Funck, Jr., Joseph Manning and others
Lippman v. Ford et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Ilene Lippman
Defendant:
Robert B Ford, Robert J. Alpern, Sally E. Blount and others
Chilcote et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00011
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Darren Chilcote and Dyann Chilcote
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hodges v. Galloway
as 1:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
Jason Bruce Hodges
Respondent:
Warden Galloway and Darren Galloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherrill v. Houston et al
as 3:2022cv02813
Plaintiff:
Shawn Sherrill
Defendant:
L. Houston, Mr. Hall, Mrs. Prescott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Ford et al
as 1:2022cv05513
Plaintiff:
Leon Martin
Defendant:
Robert B. Ford, M.D. Robert J. Alpern, Sally E. Blount and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
