Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Dixon v. Oleson et al
as 4:2013cv04104
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo D Dixon
Defendant:
Joe Oleson, Bernie Damn, Joe Deschepper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon
as 4:2013cv04079
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo D Dixon
Defendant:
Mercer County Jail Staff, Joe Deschepper, Joe Oleson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Callahan et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv10493
Plaintiff:
Kiara Callahan , Chelsea Carroll , Cassie Carson and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lee v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 3:2012cv01076
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Lee
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Remmers et al.
as 3:2012cv50193
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Remmers #D09 and Darcy Wild #C83
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Deangelo et al
as 3:2012cv50190
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Theresa Deangelo and The Chicago Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv50137
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Lee
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections and State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mangruem v. Palmer et al
as 3:2011cv50235
Plaintiff:
Franklin Deangelos Mangruem, Jr.
Defendant:
Palmer, Booth and Liston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hardy et al
as 1:2011cv00699
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo M Jones
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Frank L Shaw, Terry McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv05771
Plaintiff:
Mickey Deangelo Mason
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Salvador Gordiez, Cook County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
