Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Hale v. Tenn. Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2012cv00619
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. E. Hale
Defendant:
Tenn. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Hill et al
as 2:2012cv02383
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Pittman
Defendant:
D. Hill, John Delano, A. Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Shelby Co. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cole
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corrections, Correct Care Solutions, Randolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middlebrook v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00830
Plaintiff:
Jamie L. Middlebrook
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Dept. of Corrections, Dereck Scholfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. 201 Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2011cv02713
Plaintiff:
Edward Moore
Defendant:
201 Criminal Justice Center, Shelby County Government, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. NWCC Site 1 and Site 2 et al
as 1:2011cv01188
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale, Lewis Thomas Pate and Terry Eugene Atkins, Jr.
Defendant:
NWCC Site 1 and Site 2, Special Needs DeBerry and Tenn. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teasley v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 3:2011cv00484
Plaintiff:
Ron Teasley
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Tenn. Dept. of Corrections, Edward Adelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. State of TN et al
as 3:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Battle
Defendant:
State of TN, Dept. of Corrections , Ricky Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staggs v. Philmore et al
as 1:2010cv01285
Plaintiff:
Michael Kevin Staggs
Defendant:
Philmore, Dotson, Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. State of Tennessee Dept of Correction
as 1:2010cv01274
Petitioner:
Shelbourne J. Mason
Respondent:
State of Tennessee Dept of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
