Cases filed in New York
Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07982
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Omre v. Dorfman, MD et al
as 1:2010cv04108
Defendant: 405-86st. Pharmacy, Inc., AR & MR Pharmacy, Inc., Joseph Addeo,MD and others
Plaintiff: David Omre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Omre v. Dorfman et al
as 1:2010cv01677
Plaintiff: David Omre
Defendant: MD Vernon G. Dorfman, MD Steven Komar, MD Shawn M. Field and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tunne v. Duane Reade, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00885
Plaintiff: Mark Tunne
Defendant: Duane Reade, Inc. and Local 338 RWSDU/UFCW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10187
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cusumano et al v. Duane Reade, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01562
Plaintiff: Joseph Cusumano and Joanne Cusumano
Defendant: Duane Reade, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Fink v. Duane Reade, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03805
Plaintiff: Deborah Fink, Deborah Fink and Deborah Fink
Defendant: Duane Reade, Inc., Marlex Pharmaceuticals, Inc and F&F Foods, Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Brodsky v. Duane Reade Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00568
Plaintiff: Phyllis M. Brodsky
Defendant: Duane Reade Inc., John Doe and Sottile Security International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parmentier v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv04039
Plaintiff: Elyse Parmentier
Defendant: City of New York, Amanda Kennedy, Duane Reade Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights Both
Chisolm et al v. Duane Reade Inc.
as 1:2008cv02925
Plaintiff: Kimera Chisolm and Darryl Holly
Defendant: Duane Reade Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?