Cases 41 - 50 of 3,657
Smith v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2019cv03668
Plaintiff:
Larry Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cottrell et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2019cv02474
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Cottrell and Virginia L. Cottrell
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strong v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2019cv02470
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deere v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2019cv01337
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Deere
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cale v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2019cv01338
Plaintiff:
David W. Cale
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malhotra v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2019cv00187
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Malhotra
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Britton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2019cv00186
Plaintiff:
Carlton L. Britton
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierson et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2018cv00671
Plaintiff:
Debra Pierson and Calvin Pierson
Defendant:
The Chemours Company and E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riffle et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company
as 2:2018cv00469
Plaintiff:
Buffy Riffle and Charles L. Riffle, Jr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company
as 2:2018cv00468
Plaintiff:
Ona Fay Williams and Lester Williams
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
