Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Lemuel Hentz v. Pam Ceniga, et al
as 09-35249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEMUEL HENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
PAM J. CENIGA, Investgator, Snake River Correctional Institution, sued in her individual and official capacities, DARLA L. DAVIS, Department of Corrections Trust Account Personnel, sued in her individual and official capacites, CHERIE R. JACKSON, Department of Corrections Trust Account Personnel, sued in her individual and official capacities and others
Robert Kelly v. Sharon Blackletter
as 09-35236
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT L. KELLY
Respondent - Appellee:
SHARON BLACKLETTER, Superintendent Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution
Brian Norberg v. Sharon Blackletter
as 09-35158
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN CLAY NORBERG
Respondent - Appellee:
SHARON BLACKLETTER, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution
Shawn Shumate v. Don Mills, et al
as 08-35883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN SHUMATE
Defendant - Appellee:
DON MILLS, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Oregon Department of Corrections, D. HARDER, Supervising Executive Assistant to Don Mills, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Oregon Department of Corrections, KISHPAUGH, Segregation Lieutenant, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Oregeon Department of Corrections and others
Ronald McCall v. Sharon Blacketter
as 08-35705
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD DEAN MCCALL
Respondent - Appellee:
SHARON BLACKETTER, Superintendent of Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution
Tarabochia v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv01861
Petitioner:
Loren Christopher Tarabochia
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Snake River Mail Room Employees, Transport Employees 1-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Blacketter
as 06-36090
Petitioner - Appellant:
DUSTIN VADE MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
SHARON BLACKETTER, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
