Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv06817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ACCURATE ABSTRACTS, LLC v. HAVAS EDGE, LLC
as 2:2014cv01994
Plaintiff:
ACCURATE ABSTRACTS, LLC
Defendant:
HAVAS EDGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TWIN PEAKS DISTRIBUTING,INC. v. NEW EDGE INTERNATIONAL,LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01290
Plaintiff:
TWIN PEAKS DISTRIBUTING, INC.
Defendant:
NEW EDGE INTERNATIONAL, LLC and ARTEM IONITSA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
AIT COMPUTERS, INC v. PARALLEL EDGE, INC et al
as 1:2014cv00343
Plaintiff:
AIT COMPUTERS, INC
Defendant:
PARALLEL EDGE, INC , ABC CORPORATION #1-100 and JOHN DOE #1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TUTOR TIME LEARNING CENTERS, LLC. v. PALMER et al
as 3:2013cv05647
Plaintiff:
TUTOR TIME LEARNING CENTERS, LLC.
Defendant:
OLUFEMI PALMER, ELIZABETH PALMER, LEARNING EDGE ACADEMY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
MENTA ECSI II, INC. v. G7 DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv04402
Plaintiff:
MENTA ECSI II, INC.
Defendant:
G7 DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., CUTTING EDGE RESOURCES, INC., RICHARD COHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TWIN PEAKS DISTRIBUTING, INC. v. NEW EDGE INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02069
Plaintiff:
TWIN PEAKS DISTRIBUTING, INC.
Defendant:
NEW EDGE INTERNATIONAL, LLC and ARTEM IONITSA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
