Cases 41 - 48 of 48
PRAXIS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, LLC v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC et al
as 3:2015cv02733
Plaintiff:
PRAXIS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, LLC
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC , GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS, INC. and STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC et al v. HIKMA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. et al
as 3:2012cv01965
Plaintiff:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC , PFIZER, INC. , ENCYSIVE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Defendant:
HIKMA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. and WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICAL CORP.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION et al v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01746
Plaintiff:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION and DOW PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, INC.
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
White v. Roche Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv06478
Plaintiff:
Mary Belle White
Defendant:
Roche Laboratories, Inc., Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al v. SANDOZ, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv01866
Petitioner:
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC., STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., MEIJER, INC. and others
Respondent:
SANDOZ, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
D'APUZZO v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC et al
as 2:2007cv03291
Plaintiff:
RICHARD V. D'APUZZO
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE USA, JOHN DOE NOS. 1 THROUGH 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JENSEN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC et al
as 1:2007cv02339
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. JENSEN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICA) INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
