Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Cohen v. Groupon, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01245
Plaintiff:
Jason Cohen
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gosling v. Groupon, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01038
Plaintiff:
Sarah Gosling
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gosling v. Groupon, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01231
Petitioner:
Sarah Gosling
Respondent:
Groupon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zard v. Groupon, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01232
Plaintiff:
Brian Zard
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Kimel v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01225
Plaintiff:
Heather Kimel
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. and Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Christensen v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01233
Plaintiff:
Ashley Christensen
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Does1 through 100 and Fun Time, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
CY Technology Group LLC et al v. Groupon, Inc.
as 2:2010cv07287
Counter Defendant:
CY Technology Group LLC and MobGob, LLC
Plaintiff:
CY Technology Group LLC and MobGob, LLC
ThirdParty Defendant:
Scott Chung, Ted Chung and Richard Yoon
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Groupon, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Groupon, Inc.
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodimer et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00700
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodimer , Arfat Adil , Emili Clar and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. , Flurry, Inc. , Medialets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferreira v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ferreira
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Nordstrom, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
