Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Carter v. Duchene et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Plaintiff:
Robert D Carter
Defendant:
Clark C Duchene and Black Hills Orthopedic & Spine Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Rolling Hills Trucking Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00085
Plaintiff:
Floyd H Miller
Defendant:
Rolling Hills Trucking Inc and Joseph Lynn Scholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Treweek v. Black Hills Trucking Inc
as 2:2009cv00284
Plaintiff:
Troy Treweek
Defendant:
Black Hills Trucking Inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hill
as 2:2009cv00186
Plaintiff:
William D Hill
Defendant:
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation and American Colloid Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Blodgett v. Glick et al
as 2:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
Theresa Blodgett
Defendant:
Danny Glick and Bill Hill
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pearson v. Weischedel et al
as 1:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
James E Pearson
Defendant:
Scott Weischedel, Jack Killey, Tim Hill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Winowiecki et al v. Black Hills Bentonite LLC
as 1:2008cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Winowiecki, Jeffrey J Winowiecki, Pinnacol Assurance and others
Defendant:
Black Hills Bentonite LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Draper v. Black Hills Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tommie C Draper
Defendant:
Black Hills Corporation, Cheyenne Light Fuel and Power Company, Wayne Alan Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00206
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Wyoming Attorney General
as 2:2007cv00200
Petitioner:
William H Hill
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
