Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Luis Arnoldo Feusier-Marquez v. Adam N. Torres et al
as 2:2009cv05786
Petitioner:
Luis Arnoldo Feusier-Marquez
Respondent:
Adam N. Torres, Harley G. Lappin, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Van Nguyen v. Rodham Clinton et al
as 3:2009cv01253
Plaintiff:
Hung Van Nguyen
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton and Thomas D. Reid, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bassett et al v. Clinton et al
as 3:2009cv01190
Plaintiff:
Paul Bassett and Ji Wu Yuan
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Dan Piccuta, Robert Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sanchez-Lomeli et al v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2009cv01129
Plaintiff:
Maria Dolores Sanchez-Lomeli and Fidel Valdespino
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Michael Aytes, Paul Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00918
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Galvez v. Clinton et al
as 3:2009cv00349
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Galvez
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton and Thomas D. Reid, Jr.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
