Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv06555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05134
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
BOYKIN v. MERS/MERSCORP et al
as 2:2011cv04856
Defendant:
MERS/MERSCORP , COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP , HSBC BANK USA N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
VERA BOYKIN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1971
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SULLIVAN v. BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
as 2:2011cv01700
Plaintiff:
JUDITH J. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BOGDA v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00174
Plaintiff:
SHEILA BOGDA
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORRA v. THE BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
NINA MORRA
Defendant:
THE BANK OF AMERICA , BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. , BAC FIELD SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BEALS v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv05427
Plaintiff:
TANYA BEALS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., LASALLE BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al v. MURDOCK et al
as 2:2010cv05360
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK and MURDOCK
Thirdparty_defendant:
INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB , EAST COAST MORTGAGE CORP., INDYMAC BANK HOME LOAN SERVICING and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
