Cases 41 - 46 of 46
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Alcorn Fence Company v. Romero General Construction Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv00577
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Alcorn Fence Company
Defendant:
Romero General Construction Corp. and Hudson Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 501, AFL-CIO v. Hudson Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv01497
Defendant:
A. J. Longo & Associates, Does, Hudson Insurance Company and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Christopher Brown, Hudson Insurance Company, Michael St Denis PC and others
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 501, AFL-CIO
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ULLICO Casualty Company
The United States, for the use and benefit of QOL Corp. v. Hugo Alonso, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02211
Plaintiff:
The United States, for the use and benefit of QOL Corp.
Defendant:
Hugo Alonso, Inc. , Hudson Insurance Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Counter_claimant:
Hugo Alonso, Inc. and Hudson Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
The United States, for the use and benefit of QOL Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hudson Insurance Company v. America West Landscape Inc et al
as 2:2012cv10939
Defendant:
America West Landscape Inc, Michelle Anthony, Roy Anthony and others
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company
Cheeseburger Restaurants Inc et al v. Hudson Insurance Company et al
as 8:2009cv01186
Plaintiff:
Cheeseburger Restaurants Inc, Cheeseburger Restaurants Inc, CIP Waikiki Inc and others
Defendant:
Hudson Insurance Company, Hudson Insurance Company and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hudson Insurance Company v. Colony Insurance Company
as 5:2007cv01497
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company
Defendant:
Colony Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
