Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00790
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00720
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00676
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00317
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
HAZEL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012mc00291
Petitioner:
DWAYNE HAZEL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CRIMINAL DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Newsome v. Catone et al
as 3:2012cv02475
Plaintiff:
Brenton Boyd Newsome
Defendant:
Toby Catone, Prime Care Medical Inc., York County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAZEL v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2012cv06060
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HAZEL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, YORK COUNTY IMMIGRATION COURT, BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01869
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
MCKENZIE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012mc00177
Petitioner:
DEAN M. MCKENZIE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and BEAURU OF IMMIGRATION & CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
