Cases 41 - 50 of 14,466
Schreiner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04221
Plaintiff:
Christine E. Schreiner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Borrett v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50191
Plaintiff:
Terri Borrett
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Arwood v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50192
Plaintiff:
Vicki L. Arwood
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kelsey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04228
Plaintiff:
Robert Donald Kelsey
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Spencer et al
as 3:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Jones
Defendant:
Jeffrey D. Spencer, J. Saddler and J. Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund et al v. Ehret, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund, Mark Johnson, Chad goldschmidt and others
Defendant:
Ehret, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Powell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50186
Plaintiff:
Troy Powell
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Castleberry v. Zahtz et al
as 3:2024cv50187
Plaintiff:
Steven Castleberry
Defendant:
Merrill J Zahtz, Wexford Health Source, Monica Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
