Cases 41 - 50 of 161
BRYANT v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00430
Petitioner:
CEDRIC L BRYANT
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Department Of Corrections et al
as 0:2007cv60556
Petitioner:
Kenneth James
Respondent:
Department Of Corrections and James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fish v. State of Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2007cv01543
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Fish
Defendant:
State of Florida Department of Corrections and James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
OBOJES v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00423
Petitioner:
ANDREAS OBOJES
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OBOJES v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2007cv00412
Petitioner:
ANDREAS OBOJES
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2007cv00176
Petitioner:
LINDON JERROLD WHITE
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HONRINE v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2007cv00227
Petitioner:
FRED EUGENE HONRINE
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GONI v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 3:2007cv00395
Plaintiff:
FIDEL PEREZ GONI
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, RICH HALLOWORTH, W D RUMMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTON v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2007cv00388
Petitioner:
RONALD LEE MATTON
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOYNER v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2007cv00165
Petitioner:
MORRIS B JOYNER
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
