Cases 41 - 50 of 69
LI v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv02731
Plaintiff:
RONG LI
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, MICHAEL BORGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00627
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
COLEMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. COLEMAN
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA), THE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY APPELLATE BORD (OPRAB) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00363
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00297
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00200
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PORTLAND MINT et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 2:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
PORTLAND MINT and RONNIE SHAHAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BRAMLETT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 2:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
KENT BRAMLETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00016
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
