Cases 41 - 50 of 4,274
ALI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01722
Defendant:
MATTHEW PALMER, JAMES APPLEGATE, PHILIP T. REEKER and others
Plaintiff:
JALIL ALI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SADIQ v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01693
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, THATCHER SCHARPF, RENA BITTER and others
Plaintiff:
REHAN SADIQ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DiLELLA et al v. BURCHARD et al
as 1:2024cv01675
Defendant:
KERI POTTS, KIRSTI GARLOCK, JOHN AND JANE DOE(S) 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M DILELLA and FRANK GIORDANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JERNIGAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01666
Defendant:
SUSAN BURNS, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER and others
Plaintiff:
LARIS BRITTON JERNIGAN, XUAN THI TRAN and NHAN QUANG BAO TRAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
TAYLOR v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01643
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and TARIQUE ROBERTS
Plaintiff:
CHARMAIN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 01DCC2439 WMATA (court jurisdiction)
ALSTON v. RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES CORP. et al
as 1:2024cv01645
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALSTON
Defendant:
RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01582
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01583
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01584
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
