Cases 41 - 50 of 141
Michael E. Garrett v. John E. Potter
as 2:2009cv07674
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Garrett
Defendant:
John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Dan Harris v. John E Potter
as 2:2009cv07478
Plaintiff:
Dan Harris
Defendant:
John E Potter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
George v. Potter, et al
as 1:2003cv06052
Plaintiff:
Jody K George
Defendant:
John E Potter and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reyna v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 3:2008cv05526
Plaintiff:
Eddie Reyna
Defendant:
Adam Alvarez, Noemi Luna, Cecilia Denton and others
Mediator:
Arnold B. Haims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
William L Scott v. John E Potter
as 2:2009cv06496
Plaintiff:
William L. Scott
Defendant:
John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adrienne P. Clayton v. John E. Potter
as 2:2009cv06479
Plaintiff:
Adrienne P. Clayton
Defendant:
John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Levi O. Adelan v. John E. Potter et al
as 2:2009cv06005
Plaintiff:
Levi O. Adelan
Defendant:
John E. Potter and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lourdes Bonilla v. John E. Potter
as 2:2009cv00716
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Bonilla
Defendant:
John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
