Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Ivan Mendez v. Enrique Nieto, et al
as 14-1918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant:
ENRIQUE PENA NIETO, JACK MARKELL, THOMAS R. CARPER and others
Mendez v. Fox, et al
as 1:2013cv01322
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joseph Biden, Enrique Pena Neito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kostyshyn v. Markell et al
as 1:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Bobby Coupe, Mike DeLoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Saunders v. Jack Markell, et al
as 13-1950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK MARKELL, ANDREW H. LIPPSTONE, PERRY PHELPS and others
Kostyshyn v. Markell, et al
as 1:2013cv00364
Petitioner:
Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent:
Jack Markell, Karl Hines, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols et al v. Markell et al
as 1:2012cv00777
Plaintiff:
John A. Nichols and FuelCell Energy Inc.
Defendant:
Jack Markell, William O'Brien, Jaymes B. Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kostyshyn v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv00527
Petitioner:
Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent:
P. Morgan, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Jack Markell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cannon v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2011cv01257
Plaintiff:
Alton Cannon
Defendant:
State of Delaware, Richard R. Cooch, Joseph R. Biden, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kostyshyn v. Cauthen et al
as 1:2011cv01141
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Angelo Cauthen, Rodderick L. Johnson, Jr., P. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Markell et al
as 1:2011cv01078
Petitioner:
Robert Saunders
Respondent:
Jack Markell, Andrew H. Lippstone, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
