Cases 41 - 47 of 47
United States of America, et al v. K.O.O. Construction Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Harold E. Nutter, Inc.
Defendant:
K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of HAROLD E. NUTTER, INC. et al v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2012at00067
Plaintiff:
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Harold E. Nutter, Inc. and Harold E. Nutter, Inc.
Defendant:
K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Custom Drywall Enterprises v K.O.O. Construction Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv00510
Plaintiff:
Custom Drywall Enterprises
Defendant:
K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
v. Custom Drywall Enterprises et al
as 2:2010at00268
Defendant:
Custom Drywall Enterprises, K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Elevator Technology v. K.O.O. Construction, et al
as 09-17242
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ELEVATOR TECHNOLOGY, for the use of United States, a California corporation
Defendant:
FLAGG BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, a California corporation and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation
Kola, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01282
Plaintiff:
Kola, Inc.
Defendant:
K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company Of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
United States of America v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01282
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company Of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
