Cases 41 - 50 of 389
Gordon v. Tripp
as 4:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Gordon
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Swanson v. Evans et al
as 4:2022cv00034
Petitioner:
Robert E. Swanson
Respondent:
Jerry Evans and John Doe
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schawitsch v. Karberg
as 4:2022cv00028
Petitioner:
Michael L. Schawitsch
Respondent:
Kristofer Karberg
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2021cv00409
Petitioner:
Steven Dale Bradley
Respondent:
State of Iowa and State of Missouri
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lajeunesse v. Fifth Judicial District of Iowa et al
as 4:2021cv00401
Petitioner:
Michael A. Lajeunesse
Respondent:
Fifth Judicial District of Iowa, Attorney General of State of Iowa and State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruiz v. Stroud
as 4:2021cv00385
Petitioner:
Raul V. Ruiz, Jr.
Respondent:
Marcy Stroud
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williamson v. State of Iowa
as 4:2021cv00381
Petitioner:
Cecil Wallace Williamson, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendoza v. Schneider et al
as 4:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
Michael Mendoza
Defendant:
Kevin Schneider, Dale F Peterson, Well Path Medical Service and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cory v. Karberg
as 4:2021cv00372
Petitioner:
Jeremy Michael Cory
Respondent:
Kristofer Karberg
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. State of Iowa
as 4:2021cv00364
Petitioner:
Trent Allen Williams
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
