Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Gym-Mark, Inc et al v. Blueberry Blvd. LLC et al
as 3:2014cv05079
Plaintiff:
Gym-Mark, Inc and Gymboree Corporation, The
Defendant:
Blueberry Blvd. LLC , Kmart Corporation of Illinois, Inc. and Bon Ton Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Kerry Mill v. KMART Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv02749
Defendant:
KMART Corporation and Sears Holdings Management Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kerry Mill
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Aaron & Andrew Inc et al v. Sears Holdings Management Corp et al
as 2:2014cv01196
Plaintiff:
Aaron & Andrew Inc and Aaron Design Inc
Defendant:
American International Industries Inc, Does, KMart Corporation and others
Jocelyn Romero v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00944
Defendant:
Does, Kmart Corporation and Sears Holdings Management Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Romero
Manny Jiminez v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv06505
Defendant:
Does, Kmart Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Manny Jiminez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03342
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
e.Digital Corporation v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2013cv00783
Plaintiff:
e.Digital Corporation
Defendant:
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Futurewei Technologies, Inc., Huawei Device USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sung Woo Textile Inc v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv02237
Defendant:
Adjmi Ch Brands LLC, Does, Dreamsicle Sportswear Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sung Woo Textile Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
