Cases 41 - 50 of 50
MOREJON v. A & L RODRIGUEZ CORP et al
as 1:2014cv21937
Plaintiff:
MARIELA MOREJON
Defendant:
A & L RODRIGUEZ CORP and LISETT RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Galindo v. Cuba Tropical, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv23243
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Galindo
Defendant:
Cuba Tropical, Inc. and Jose L. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rodriguez v. Adee et al
as 8:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Paul Adee, Sgt. Richards and David Gee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Gee et al
as 8:2011cv01244
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Rodriguez
Defendant:
David Gee, Paul Adee, Hillsborough County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Hillsborough County Jail
as 8:2011mc00015
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos et al v. Cuba Tropical, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv23818
Plaintiff:
Felix Santos , Carlos Garcia and Jose A. Valdes Prieto
Defendant:
Cuba Tropical, Inc. and Jose L. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Coty Inc et al v. C Lenu, Inc et al
as 1:2010cv21812
Plaintiff:
Coty Inc , Zino Davidoff SA , Calvin Klein Trademark Trust and others
Defendant:
C Lenu, Inc , Caridad Rodriguez , Victor L. Rodriguez and others
Movant:
Duty Free World, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Ciber Office 2013, C.A. v. Seafreight Line LTD. et al
as 1:2009cv22193
Plaintiff:
Ciber Office 2013, C.A.
Defendant:
Seafreight Line LTD., Seafreight Agencies (USA), Inc., Seatruck, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Rodriguez v. Bayus Security Services Inc et al
as 1:2009cv20139
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Bayus Security Services Inc and Olalekan M Shokunbi
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Provident Bank v. Rodriguez
as 1:2008cv21830
Plaintiff:
The Provident Bank
Defendant:
Osmel L. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
