Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Wells v. Nooth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00758
Defendant: Judy Gilmore and Mark Nooth
Plaintiff: Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Bristol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00680
Defendant: Dr. Thomas Bristol, A. Clements, Dr. Jodean Elliott-Blakeslee and others
Plaintiff: James Leroy Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant: Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff: Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crampton v. USA
as 6:2016cv00472
Petitioner: Preston Leroy Crampton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wells v. Byl et al
as 2:2016cv00422
Defendant: Neil F. Byl, Megan Door, Alex Gardner and others
Plaintiff: Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2016cv00423
Defendant: Neil F. Byl, Michael Casey, C. Criswell and others
Plaintiff: Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv00327
Defendant: Vicki Applegate, Samuel A. Kubernick, Kim Migliaccio and others
Plaintiff: Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2015cv02245
Defendant: C. Crowell, T. Garner, Judy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff: Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2015cv02130
Defendant: Marc Brown, Neil F. Byl, Peter Gartlan and others
Plaintiff: Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv01639
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Petitioner: Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?