Cases filed in New York
Cases 41 - 50 of 369
Boyd v. Seagen Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03309
Plaintiff: Janet Boyd
Defendant: Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, David R. Epstein and others
Wang v. Seagen Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03302
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Defendant: Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, Ph.D., David R. Epstein and others
In re Seagen, Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03254
Plaintiff: Ryan O'Dell
Defendant: Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, Ph.D., David R. Epstein and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Sandra Ober, Elaine Wang and Janet Boyd
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02509
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Thompson v. Duck Creek Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01926
Plaintiff: John Thompson
Defendant: Duck Creek Technologies, Inc., Michael Jackowski, William Bloom and others
Finger v. Duck Creek Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01808
Plaintiff: Susan Finger
Defendant: Duck Creek Technologies, Inc., William Bloom, Kathleen Crusco and others
Bushansky v. Duck Creek Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01733
Plaintiff: Stephen Bushansky
Defendant: Duck Creek Technologies, Inc., William Bloom, Kathleen Crusco and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01598
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Miller v. Warren et al
as 6:2023cv06130
Plaintiff: Timothy Lamell Miller
Defendant: Lovely Ann Warren, City Hall and City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Duck Creek Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01526
Plaintiff: Kimberly Powell
Defendant: Duck Creek Technologies, Inc., Bill Bloom, Kathy Crusco and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?