Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Santana v. Zhang et al
as 3:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jose Santana
Defendant:
Ronald Zhang, S. Roberts, M. Glynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arellano, Jr. v. Dean et al
as 3:2015cv02247
Plaintiff:
Raul Arellano, Jr.
Defendant:
K. Dean, S. Pasha, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Arellano v. Milton et al
as 3:2015cv02069
Plaintiff:
Raul Arellano
Defendant:
Milton, Doe #2, Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arellano v. Sedighi et al
as 3:2015cv02059
Plaintiff:
Raul Arellano
Defendant:
Sedighi, R. Walker, S. Roberts, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Sleeley et al
as 3:2014cv01525
Plaintiff:
Ruben Dario Garcia, Jr
Defendant:
Sleeley, A. Canlas, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2014cv01397
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bell
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, M. Glynn, Kyle Seeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florence v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
James E. Florence
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, S. A. Sanchez, Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theodore Butler v. J. Rivera, et al
as 13-57074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. RIVERA, Chief Medical Executive, J. WALKER, Chief of HC Appeals, RICKI BARNETT, Utilization Review Physician and others
Thomas v. Case et al
as 3:2013cv02011
Plaintiff:
Keith Thomas
Defendant:
Matthew Case, John Doe, S. Pasha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvador Solis v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 13-56256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALVADOR SOLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, J. CLARK KELSO, Federal Receiver/Medical, K. SEELY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
