Cases 41 - 50 of 197
Malone v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00664
Plaintiff:
Shelia M. Malone
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malone v. Social 25 et al
as 1:2019cv06109
Plaintiff:
Jamell O Malone
Defendant:
Social 25 and City of Chicago Police Dept. Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05742
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc., Daniel K. Malone, Transportation Leasing Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations et al
as 1:2019cv06110
Defendant:
Evelio Mora, Jacob Thundiyil, Rocco J. Claps and others
Plaintiff:
Jamell O Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Okorafor et al
as 1:2019cv06165
Plaintiff:
Jamell O Malone
Defendant:
Illinois Human Rights Commission, Illinois Department of Human Rights and Ngozi Okorafor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Machine Tool Bids, LLC v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03938
Defendant:
Nationwide Equipment Transportation, Inc., CRST MALONE, INC. and CRST International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Machine Tool Bids, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Malone v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04477
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley B. Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Southwest Airlines Voucher Litigation
as 1:2011cv08176
Plaintiff:
Herbert C. Malone and Adam J Levitt
Intervenor:
Gregory Markow
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines, Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
