Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Brown et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01047
Plaintiff:
Gertrude Brown , Jose Guardado , Robert Hazeltin and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BONO v. O'CONNOR et al
as 3:2015cv06326
Plaintiff:
DAVID BONO
Defendant:
DANIEL J. O'CONNOR, DAVID J. MAURO, SAMIR KHLEIF and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MAYES v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2015cv00820
Plaintiff:
BRENDA MAYES
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIEBECK et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv05240
Plaintiff:
MAYE LIEBECK
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPONE v. BARNES-MAYES et al
as 1:2012cv00336
Plaintiff:
PETER CAPONE
Defendant:
SHIRLANA M. BARNES-MAYES and JOHN DOE (1 THROUGH 5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYES et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2011cv07516
Plaintiff:
CLAUDICE MAYES and ROBERT MAYES
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MAYES v. DEVRY UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2011cv02009
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MAYES
Defendant:
DEVRY UNIVERSITY , CHARLES STUEWE , PAUL CERMINARA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MAYES et al v. DEVRY INC. et al
as 3:2010cv06216
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MAYES and JOHN K MCGLYNN
Defendant:
DEVRY INC. and DEVRY UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MAYES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv03913
Plaintiff:
JERRY MAYES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COUNCIL v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2009cv00429
Plaintiff:
HERBERT COUNCIL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., CLAUDE MAYE, ODEM and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
