Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCPHERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30393
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. MCPHERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
MCPHERSON v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv82266
Plaintiff:
HAROLD R. MCPHERSON and JEAN MCPHERSON
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCPHERSON et al v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS et al
as 2:2009cv20005
Plaintiff:
LANA KAREN MCPHERSON, LANA KAREN MCPHERSON, GORDON MCPHERSON and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS, WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES and A.H. ROBINS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McPHERSON et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv65362
Plaintiff:
EVERETT McPHERSON, EVERETT McPHERSON, EVERETT McPHERSON and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
AMOS et al v. ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING AND SUPPLY et al
as 2:2007cv66630
Plaintiff:
BILLY JOE AMOS, SR., FAYE DORIS ARINGTON, CLEM ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING AND SUPPLY, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ADAMS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66365
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE J. ADAMS, ROSIE ADAMS, CHARLES ALLARD and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
