Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 14.38 Acres, more or less, in Nelson County, VA, located on parcel ID No. 21 A 113, identified as that certain tract of land composed of 183.99 acres, more or less et al
as 3:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
14.38 Acres, more or less, in Nelson County, VA, located on parcel ID No. 21 A 113, identified as that certain tract of land composed of 183.99 acres, more or less and Eva Jane Maki
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 7.82 acres, more or less, in Augusta County, Virginia et al
as 5:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Joseph S. Cochran, III, Inez L. Cochran and 7.82 acres, more or less, in Augusta County, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 15.71 acres, more or less, in Augusta County, Virginia et al
as 5:2018cv00124
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Edgar Allan Bocock, Jr., 15.71 acres, more or less, in Augusta County, Virginia and Linda S. Bocock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.32 Acre, more or less, in Nelson County, VA, Located on Parcel IC No. 20-1-12, identified as that certain tract of land composed of 5.100 acres, et al et al
as 3:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.32 Acre, more or less, in Nelson County, VA, Located on Parcel IC No. identified as that certain tract of land composed of 5.100 acres, et al and Nancy Holstein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 3.17 acres, more or less, in the city of Suffolk, Virginia. PLEASE FILE IN CASE 3:17-cv-814-JAG ONLY!
as 2:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.17 acres, more or less, in the city of Suffolk, Virginia, located on parcel identification nos. 28-1 and 28-2, identified as that certain portion of land composed of 57.8 acres, more or less, et al and Gateway, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 5.68 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA. PLEASE FILE IN CASE 3:17-cv-814-JAG ONLY!
as 2:2018cv00507
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
5.68 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 32*2A, IDENTIFIED AS 158.02621 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN MAP BOOK 16, PAGE 39, et al, Cynthia G. Robinson and Christopher B. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 7.48 Acres, More or Less, in Lovingston District, Nelson Co., Virginia, Located on Parcel ID No. 70 A 1, Identified as General Warranty Deed in Book 29, Page 422, of the Public Records of Said Co.; et al
as 3:2018cv00089
Defendant:
Beverly Borenstein, Mary Callaway, Carl Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 7.73 Acres, More or Less, In Brunswick County, Virginia et al. PLEASE FILE IN CASE 3:17-cv-814-JAG ONLY!
as 3:2018cv00652
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
The Unknown Heirs of Theodore Randolph Hicks, Ethel Florine White, 7.73 Acres, More or Less, In Brunswick County, Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 16.49 acres, more or less, in Bath County, Virginia et al
as 5:2018cv00116
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
James Lee Rice, III and 16.49 acres, more or less, in Bath County, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 9.50 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN NOTTOWAY COUNTY, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 34-00026 et al
as 3:2018cv00608
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Floyd William Drinkwater, Diana H. Drinkwater and 9.50 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN NOTTOWAY COUNTY, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 34-26
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
