Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Yelton v. United States Bankruptcy Court et al
as 4:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Alice Marilyn Yelton
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court, Kenneth E Herb and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson et al v. McGrath, et al
as 2:2011cv01175
Plaintiff:
Carl Anderson , Rosalie Anderson , Robert F Barton and others
Defendant:
Gregory K McGrath, John A Ensign, Daniel P Buettin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mausser v. Enhanced Recovery Company LLC
as 2:2011cv00680
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Mausser
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mausser et al v. Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
as 2:2011cv00678
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mausser and Marilyn Mausser
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Erovick v. Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv02347
Plaintiff:
Marilyn J Erovick
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated , Zicam LLC and Botanical Laboratories Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mausser v. Scottsdale Collection Services LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02136
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Mausser
Defendant:
Scottsdale Collection Services LLC, Richard Bartlett and Marlene Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
House v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02065
Plaintiff:
Marilyn T House
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hartman et al v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00747
Plaintiff:
Marilyn J. Hartman and William E. Ruf
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated , Zicam LLC and Botanical Laboratories Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
