Cases 41 - 50 of 570
Edwards v. Inch et al
as 6:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Edwards
Defendant:
Mark Inch, W. Bowden and T. Svendsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv04821
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE MOORE
Defendant:
MARK INCH, LANE, JOHN DOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAEZ v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv14004
Plaintiff:
JA'QUAN SAEZ
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Ashley Moody and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POWELL v. DESANTIS et al
as 3:2022cv00594
Petitioner:
EDDIE POWELL
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, MARK INCH, GEO PRIVATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Cruz et al
as 3:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hardin
Defendant:
Dr. Cruz, Ricky Dixon, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DESANTIS et al
as 5:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
TYRONE L SMITH
Respondent:
RON DESANTIS and MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole v. Inch, et al.
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
Lemuel L. Cole
Respondent:
Mark Inch and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas Jackson v. Mark Inch, et al
as 21-14351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK INCH, Individual and Official Capacity as Secretary, J. BALDRIDGE, Individual and Official Capacity as Warden, R SCHMITT, Individual and Official Capacity as Assistant Warden and others
Laycock v. Inch et al
as 1:2022cv20331
Plaintiff:
James B. Laycock
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Correctional Officer Gibbs, Correctional Officer Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFERSON v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv24367
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B JEFFERSON
Defendant:
Mark Inch and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
