Cases 41 - 50 of 106
Monk v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00036
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Brenda Monk
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fisher v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv00026
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Fisher
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00031
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Sharon S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ahern v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Ahern
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy, Michael B. Mukasey and SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edwards v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00062
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Carlos Edwards
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy, Michael B. Mukasey and SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hobson v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00313
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Mark G. Hobson
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Damata v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv00019
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Hope M. Damata
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Richards v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv00017
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Pamela M. Richards
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Shrewsbury v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00229
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Ginger Leigh Shrewsbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ward v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv00008
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Ann F. Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
