Cases 41 - 49 of 49
REHMAN v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv00702
Plaintiff:
ABDUR REHMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00565
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SINGH v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2007cv06162
Petitioner:
DHANNA SINGH
Respondent:
EDMOND C. CICCHI, SCOTT WEBER, JULIE L. MEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
GIL-LONDONO v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2007cv06051
Petitioner:
WILLIAM GIL-LONDONO
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JAMES SHAUNESSY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv05833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHI NONG GUO v. MICHAEL CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv05741
Plaintiff:
SHI NONG GUO
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
RAZZIDDIN v. PLOUSIS et al
as 2:2007cv05868
Plaintiff:
ABUSSAMAA RASUL RAZZIDDIN
Defendant:
JAMES T. PLOUSIS, DAN ABEL, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SINGH v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2007cv05603
Petitioner:
DILBAG SINGH
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BECKER v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2007cv05421
Petitioner:
JAN F. BECKER
Respondent:
HUDSON, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT A. FIATAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
