Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Schmidt v. Target Corporation of Minnesota
as 3:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
Mary Schmidt
Defendant:
Target Corporation of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tucker v. Target Corp of Minnesota
as 5:2017cv01536
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Tucker
Defendant:
Target Corp of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN Re: In the Matter of CHS Inc of Minnesota
as 2:2017cv09144
Petitioner:
CHS Inc of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30504
Pettry v. Target Corporation of Minnesota et al
as 2:2017cv07723
Plaintiff:
Melissa Pettry
Defendant:
Target Corporation of Minnesota and ACE American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lovelady v. Target Corporation of Minnesota et al
as 3:2017cv00446
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company and Target Corporation of Minnesota
Plaintiff:
Herman Lovelady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Minnesota Life Insurance Co v. Lightfoot et al
as 6:2017cv00823
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Co
Defendant:
Reva Lightfoot, Anastasia Boyd, Deidra Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Levasseur v. CHS Inc. of Minnesota
as 2:2017cv05157
Defendant:
CHS Inc of Minnesota
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Levasseur
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Alexander v. CHS Inc of Minnesota
as 2:2017cv04914
Plaintiff:
Corey Alexander
Defendant:
CHS Inc of Minnesota
Consol_plaintiff:
Ulysses Levasseur
Consol_defendant:
CHS Inc of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Keller v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02004
Plaintiff:
Warren J Keller
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Target Corporation of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Target Corporation of Minnesota
as 2:2016cv16753
Plaintiff:
Aundra Brooks
Defendant:
Target Corporation of Minnesota and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
