Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Anand v. CA Dept of Develop, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2004cv01575
Plaintiff: Karuna Anand
Defendant: Department of Developmental Services of the State of California , Norm Kramer , Theresa Belleci and others
Intervenor: Lawrence J. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hernan Orozco v. Norm Kramer
as 09-55852
Petitioner - Appellant: HERNAN OROZCO
Respondent - Appellee: NORM KRAMER, Executive Director of Coalinga State Hospital
Lawtis Rhoden v. Stephen Mayberg, et al
as 09-15420
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN W. MAYBERG, Director of The Calfornia Dept. of Mental Health, BRENDA EPPERLY-ELLIS, DAWN RENEE STARR and others
Litmon v. Kramer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv02569
Petitioner: David Litmon, Jr.
Respondent: Norm Kramer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hernan Orozco v. Norm Kramer
as 2:2008cv03291
Petitioner: Hernan Orozco
Respondent: Norm Kramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-15933
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ron Lee v. Norm Kramer
as 2:2008cv01823
Petitioner: Ron Lee
Respondent: Norm Kramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sokolsky v. Kramer
as 08-55198
Petitioner - Appellant: MARK STEVEN SOKOLSKY
Respondent - Appellee: NORM KRAMER, Executive Director
Rhoden v. Mayberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00100
Plaintiff: Lawtis Donald Rhoden
Defendant: Stephen W. Mayberg, Brenda Epperly-Ellis, Dawn Renee Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv06295
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?