Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Collins v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2010cv04679
Petitioner:
Bernest Collins
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, United States Marshal Service and Gregory Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bagha v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2010cv01047
Petitioner:
Victor Bagha
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dickens v. Fullwood et al
as 1:2010cv00933
Plaintiff:
Craig Dickens
Defendant:
Isaac Fullwood and Commissioners of the United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael O. DeVaughn v. United States Parole Commission
as 2:2010cv03326
Petitioner:
Michael O. DeVaughn
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Hughes v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2010cv01478
Petitioner:
Andre Hughes
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Isaac Fulwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steven Graham v. Linda Sanders et al
as 2:2010cv02316
Petitioner:
Steven Graham
Respondent:
Linda Sanders and The United States Parole Commission
Robert James Franks v. Linda Sanders et al
as 2:2010cv01319
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Linda Sanders and U.S. Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Robert James Franks
Robert James Franks v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv00594
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and United States Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Robert James Franks
213) 894-7819 (fax:
United States of America
Thomas v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2009cv05854
Petitioner:
Ricky Thomas
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Victor Bagha v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 2:2009cv07466
Petitioner:
Victor Bagha
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
