Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft
as 3:2017cv00582
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Smith
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bernz et al v. Dodson Boatyard LLC
as 3:2013cv01301
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bernz , Robert Gray , Jonathan Pratt and others
Defendant:
Dodson Boatyard LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Caristo et al v. Boeing Co et al
as 3:2013cv00652
Plaintiff:
Dominic Caristo and Joan Caristo
Defendant:
Boeing Co , CBS Corporation , Foster Wheeler L.L.C. and others
Cross_claimant:
CBS Corporation and Boeing Co
Cross_defendant:
CBS Corporation , Boeing Co , Foster Wheeler L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Chartis Chile Compania De Seguros Generales S.A. et al v. Pratt & Whitney Power Sys Inc
as 3:2010cv01478
Plaintiff:
Chartis Chile Compania De Seguros Generales S.A. , Liberty Compania De Seguros Generales S.A. and Compania De Seguros Generales Penta Security
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney Power Sys Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
