Cases 41 - 50 of 285
Ciampa v. C. R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05568
Plaintiff:
Philip Ciampa
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Ethicon Inc, Davol Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Talley, Sr. v. Koninkelijke Philips, NV, et al
as 1:2021cv01963
Plaintiff:
Eric Talley, Sr.
Defendant:
Koninkelijke Philips, Nv, Philips North America, LLC, Philips RS North America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cornwell v. Philips North America, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv04860
Plaintiff:
Michael Cornwell
Defendant:
Philips North America, LLC, Koninklijke Philips Electronic N.V., Philips RS North America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
French v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03347
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Philip French
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kanieski v. Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01005
Defendant:
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. and Rebecca Leaper
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kanieski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bonnie et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02251
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Natale S. Bonnie and Philip A. Bonnie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Osborn et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01934
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Becton Dickinson & Company and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Philip Osborn and Jane Osborn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Alander v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01274
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
PHILIP WAYNE ALANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
